Dear Editor:
I am writing in response to your Feb. 3 editorial, Mixed Message.
I agree with you that the "Metro paradigm of taxation without (direct) representation" should be changed to ensure the people are properly represented.
I agree with you that our local representatives must fight to protect our interests in the "rough and tumble of regional debate" especially with respect to the potential $1-billion cost for a new sewage treatment facility.
The North Shore could end up bearing the lion's share of the cost, if the other members of Metro decide that the cost is ours, not theirs.
Remember, Metro's voting structure is heavily skewed (weighted) in favour of the larger communities, as evidenced by the vote for the chair and vice-chair of Metro. This means, if the "fix is in," there is little we can do to change the result because it will have been preordained between the major players in the dark halls of Metro - the "art of compromise" would be not be a factor.
Finally, I do not agree with your comment "The North Shore is already perceived to have unduly benefited from the Capilano-Seymour water filtration initiative." Ridiculous! Perceived by whom? This statement should be attributed or withdrawn.
The North Shore, in particular the District of North Vancouver, has had to endure years of dust, heavy equipment vibration, service disruptions, noise and water main ruptures in support of an initiative of regional benefit. Metro is aware of this fact; and members of the board should be aware.
If they are not, and if the perception is held by the board that we have unduly benefited, then indeed it's time for a Sea to Sky Regional District.
Doug MacKay-Dunn, Councillor District of North Vancouver
