Dear Editor:
Re: Men’s Recovery House Debated In Seymour, Sept. 18 front-page story.
The headline is misleading.
There was no debate and it was obvious from the get-go that council wishes this project to go ahead. Anyone present at the meeting could tell that council, while appearing to listen to all opinions, had in fact made their minds up.
There’s a reason why Turning Point’s rezoning applications have never failed. While (social planner) Ms. (Annie) Mauboules and (planner) Ms. (Natasha) Letchford claim the application conforms to the OCP, the application does not in fact conform. Sections 4.1, 9.1 and 11.1 clearly indicate this rezoning should not proceed. This house is as good as built.
Dave Iverson
North Vancouver
What are your thoughts? Send us a letter via email by clicking here or post a comment below.
