Our governments won’t save us. That’s the conclusion we inexorably reach when considering the hurricanes, wildfires, and most terrifyingly, the complacency that have so far accompanied global climate change.
We applaud the City of North Vancouver for enacting new rules to lower the amount of energy needed to heat homes and highrises. It’s a prudent measure, but simply put, there are some things a city council can’t do. And what local governments can’t do, our federal leaders won’t do.
Earlier this year, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau explained his energy policy thusly: “No country would find 173 billion barrels of oil in the ground and just leave them there.”
The ‘I-betcha-you-would-have-done-same!’ philosophy is illuminating in that it avoids logic and morality. It’s pure rationalization.
Of course, he added three buzzwords that are the equivalent of sterilizing the needle used for lethal injection: responsibly, safely and sustainably.
According to a recent NASA study, our planet produced more atmospheric carbon dioxide in 2015 and 2016 than at any point in the last 2,000 years. With that in mind, we suggest there is no way to responsibly, safely and sustainably burn 173 billion barrels of oil.
For too long, environmental issues have been the property of liberal political parties. It’s time conservatives tried to wrest away an issue that should be inherent to their identity - conservation.
As much as we care about balanced budgets and job creation, our leaders must ultimately be assessed on the ability of future generations to breathe the air and drink the water.
Our governments can’t save us, but maybe we can save them.
What are your thoughts? Send us a letter via email by clicking here or post a comment below.
