Dear Editor:
Contrary to your article of Nov. 20 on the new alternative program slated to commence at Balmoral in September 2012, there has not been "too little consultation with neighbours."
There has been none. What the school trustees also didn't address is whether housing an alternative school, students with a diagnosed mental illness (the therapeutic day program), students who experience attendance problems due to health, drug use, personal and family dysfunction (the youth learning centre) and adults seeking a high school diploma in one facility is good for students or the community.
This new facility is half a block from two elementary schools.
Trustee Susan Skinner says that the move will reduce the stigma for students.
How does ghettoizing alternative students assist? The amalgamation of services approach reminds me of the Downtown Eastside. We all see how well it works there.
Of interest, Skinner lives at one of three sites rejected by the board.
Since Barry Forward lives in the Handsworth catchment it is of no concern to him that the Delbrook community will be the location.
I would like to know if any of the trustees have children at Braemar elementary or Ãcole André-Piolat.
As the plan is in place and there have still been no efforts to inform or consult with the community, I will be happy to set up a picket line at the school in September to advise the trustees, council and the mayor of my views.
Lisa Buss
North Vancouver
